La tutela della dignità umana: fondamento e scopo della Convenzione di Oviedo. In: Furlan, E. Bioetica e dignità umana: Interpretazioni a. PDF on ResearchGate | On May 1, , R Andorno and others published La tutela della dignità umana: fondamento e scopo della Convenzione di Oviedo. Venti anni dopo la Convenzione di Oviedo / Equitable access, appropriate quality . Twenty years after the Oviedo Convention | Il diritto alla tutela della salute.

Author: Samule Shak
Country: Grenada
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Software
Published (Last): 19 March 2012
Pages: 11
PDF File Size: 10.47 Mb
ePub File Size: 8.76 Mb
ISBN: 350-5-60657-619-1
Downloads: 2154
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Shakar

Translations sorted by non-official languages. Stephan Guttinger – – Science and Engineering Ethics 24 4: Monthly downloads Sorry, there are not convenzikne data points to plot this chart. Details of Treaty No. The greater the patient’s chances of being able to return to a normal life, and the more irrational the reasons for the refusal appear to be, the more difficult it is for the physician to respect such a refusal.

Rivisteweb: Article Details

Firme e ratifiche Riserve et Dichiarazioni Rapporto esplicativo Protocolli. The treatment of persons unable to give their consent, such as children and people with mental illnesses, may be carried out only if it could produce real and direct benefit to his or her health. Un intervento su persone incapaci di dare il proprio consenso, per esempio su un minore o su una persona sofferente di turbe mentali, non deve essere eseguito, salvo che non produca un reale e sicuro vantaggio per la sua salute.

Find it on Scholar. Additional Protocols are foreseen to clarify, strengthen and supplement the overall Convention. Benjamin Hurlbut – – Hastings Center Report 45 5: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine.

Signatures and ratifications Reservations and declarations Explanatory report Protocols. Science Logic and Mathematics. Human Genome Editing and Ethical Considerations. If, in particular, the intent is to deduce applicable “rules” in cases such as these from the system in force, the jurist ought to perform a truly “humble act” and don the garb of the “pure” and “neutral” exegete of actual fact, abstaining from philosophical or political improvisations, and instead make an effort to “set aside” personal convictions to avoid surreptitiously altering the course of reasoning.

The only exception is, under certain conditions, obiedo regenerative tissue especially bone marrow between siblings. Traduzioni ordinati per lingue non ufficiali. The author tackles the theme of the refusal on the part of a patient of a certain therapy, when such decision produces a health hazard or mortal danger. For the most part, respect for the will of the patient will be experienced by the physician as a sort of “facilitation” of self-destructive behaviour intrinsically contradictory with respect to the original sense of the medical profession.


History of Western Philosophy. Added to PP index Total downloads 1 1, of 2, Recent downloads 6 si 1of 2, How can I increase my downloads? In his reconstruction of the various positions, the author shows covnenzione jurisprudence oscillates between the extremes convenzlone the identification of compulsory “atypical” measures useful to the physician in fulfilling his duty to safeguard health even “contra voluntatem”, and the recognition of an absolute and pre-eminent significance to the refusal of medical care, even when such cannot be confirmed owing to the patient’s state of unconsciousness.

Ovirdo Convenzione riconosce anche il diritto del paziente a non essere informato. On one side of the issue is the essentially dominant approach, which deduces from the clear expression contained in Art. No categories specified categorize this paper.

Rodriguez – – Journal of Clinical Research and Bioethics 7 2. The Convention is the first legally-binding international text designed to preserve human dignity, rights and freedoms, through a series of principles and prohibitions against the misuse of biological and medical advances. Genome Editing, Asilomar, and the Politics of Deliberation. Undoubtedly, to some extent this disparity of viewpoints is only normal in reference to such a complex emotional issue.

La sola eccezione si ha, a certe condizioni, per il prelievo di tessuti rigenerabili tra fratelli e sorelle. Wade – – Bioessays 39 Ben Merriman – – American Journal of Bioethics 15 The Convention stipulates that all patients have a right to be informed about their health, including the results of predictive genetic tests.

Torrance – – Hastings Center Report 47 5: Martina Baumann – – NanoEthics 10 2: Essa permette interventi di ingegneria genetica solo per ragioni preventive, diagnostiche o terapeutiche e solo quando il suo scopo non sia di modificare il patrimonio genetico di una persona.

The Convention recognises the importance of promoting a public debate and consultation on these questions.

For the most part, in this field the law intervenes “a posteriori” to evaluate in hindsight and with an outcome that is practically unforeseeable the penal implications of the situation. On the other hand, health care imposed by force, however conceived and carried out, evidently will assume the characteristics of a violent act particularly humiliating not just because aimed at the “body” of the patient, but above all because bound to downgrade the most deeply-rooted convictions of the interested party: What legal theory can nevertheless be reproached for is its frequent indulgence in considerations which may be of notable cultural significance, but which risk being misleading in the context of argumentation that aspires to be perfectly juridical.


The Convention’s starting point is that the interests of human beings must come before ovied interests of science or society. No keywords specified fix it. It prohibits the use of techniques of medically assisted procreation to help choose the sex of a child, except where it would avoid a serious hereditary condition.

Neri Demetrio, Crispr-Cas9, la convenzione di Oviedo e le generazioni future – PhilPapers

The Convention prohibits convenzjone removal of organs and other tissues which cannot be regenerated from people not able to give consent. The inconsistency of this ban with regard to the most widespread position in the scientific community is ovieddo, and then critically examined the supporting reasons which, in the opinion of the author, are not consistent with a rational analysis of the inner structure of the Convention, in particular in relation to the issue of responsibility towards future generations.

Nevertheless, at the time when a practical decision is imperative the physician might look in vain for guidance in convehzione theory and practice, which up to now have proved capable only of providing a highly contradictory gamut of solutions: Challenges, Ethical Concerns and Implications. The Convention recognises also the convenziond right not to know. La Convenzione vieta ogni forma di discriminazione nei confronti di una persona in base al suo patrimonio genetico e autorizza test genetici solo a fini medici.

The Convention sets out rules related to medical research by including detailed and precise conditions, especially for people who cannot give their consent.


The only restrictions are those prescribed by law and which are necessary in a democratic society in the interest of public safety, for the prevention of crime, for the protection of public health or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others. Sign in to use this feature. It prohibits the creation of human embryos for research purposes and requires an adequate protection of embryos where countries allow in-vitro research.

La Convenzione statuisce che ogni paziente ha il diritto di conoscere ogni informazione raccolta sulla propria condizione di salute, in particolare i risultati dei testi genetici. Scienza E Filosofia Treaty Office on http: